Thursday, 20 November 2014

How to Resolve a Maritime Dispute?

Maritime disputes tend to be international and commercial in their nature and often highly complex. Thankfully today court litigation is not the only method for resolving a dispute. There are essentially six modern methods of dispute resolution, as follows:

Negotiation – This is where the parties get together and try to negotiate a settlement of the issues and perhaps claims between them. It can be effective because the dispute will be elevated to a higher level within the firms in question, perhaps taking the dispute out of the hands of the individuals who are at loggerheads. Commercial considerations begin to be more at play and there can be a greater appetite to compromise. It is also the most cost effective method costing nothing, other than perhaps the cost of supporting legal advice or assistance with the negotiation process.

Mediation – Mediation essentially involves the appointment of an individual to go between the parties and see if they can find common ground or tease out settlement terms that would be acceptable to both sides.

Conciliation – Tends to be reserved for employment disputes.

Adjudication – Tends to be reserved for construction disputes. This method is very quick because often there is a strict timetable for submitting evidence and providing an Award. The adjudicator in Construction disputes in the UK must provide a decision within 28 days of the instruction. This has been intentionally designed for construction disputes where daily costs are often being incurred of hundreds of thousands and if a project were to be delayed for a series of months it would cause considerable economic impact. So the parties sacrifice the ability to present their case and analyse it in granular detail for the right to obtain a swift judgment.

Arbitration – This where the parties appoint an arbitrator or a panel of three arbitrators to listen to their case and give a judgment in much the same way that a court would, but without the strict rules of evidence, delays, formality and the need for lawyers. Also, importantly, it can be done and normally is in private. So the media and the public never become aware of the facts or judgment. The parties can go to arbitration by having a standard term in their contract agreeing to do so, or by agreeing to resolve a dispute that has otherwise arisen by arbitration. They may decide on almost every element of how the arbitration should be conducted, but tend to choose a standard form of rules such as the UNCITRAL, CIArb, CII Rules etc., which provide adaptable templates for Arbitration procedures. Arbitration is by far the most common way to resolve maritime disputes and frequently the LMAA (or London Maritime Arbitrators’ Association) Rules are used.

Litigation – If all else fails the parties always have their original recourse to a court of law.



Monday, 20 October 2014

Which Countries are Currently Under US Sanctions?

A reader wrote in to ask which countries,  other than Iran and North Korea, they should be wary of trading with because of potential US Sanctions problems; as they are just about to enter a contract with a US entity and want to ensure compliance with all US regulations. The answer is an awful lot of countries.



The USA currently sanctions involving the following countries and regions of the world:

- Balkans
- Belarus
- Burma
- Central African Republic
- Cuba
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Ivory Coast
- Iran
- Iraq
- Lebanon
- Moldova (Magnitsky sanctions)
- North Korea
- Russia
- Somalia
- Sudan
- South Sudan
- Syria
- Ukraine
- Yemen
- Zimbabwe

The content of these sanctions differs from country to country and some are extra-geographic (not country specific), such as the diamond trade sanctions and restrictions on criminal organisations, however, it is important to ensure compliance in the above regions, particularly when trading in US Dollars.

The Risks of Trading in the Ukraine

Many shipowners are asking at present - what are the risks of trading in the Ukraine in the current circumstances?



Well apart from the dangerous security situation in the eastern and southern provinces, the principal risk is that of breaching the US and western sanctions. The full sanctions of the US are available here but in short, in response to events in the region in 2014 there were three rounds of international sanctions, both from the US and the EU and other western nations (Australia, Switzerland, Japan etc.). Most of these actions were restrictions on Russian individuals, companies and banks from trading, travelling etc. but some of the sanctions are so far reaching that, in order to ensure no breaches occur, a party trading with or in Ukraine must essentially choose to either trade with Crimea (now under Russian control) or with the remainder of Ukraine (Odessa or Kiev for instance).

If you move between a contested region and government controlled Ukraine, especially if you transport cargo between the two, you will be at risk of sanctions related penalties, vessel seizures and potentially confiscations. The risk is especially strong trading from Crimea to Odessa and there are reports of an increase in vessel arrests in the region generally. Shipowners beware.

Monday, 27 January 2014

The Maritime Labour Convention 2006: A basic guide to liabilities

The Maritime Labour Convention 2006 (MLC) is a new Convention which aims to bring together and update existing conventions regarding the employment of seafarers onboard commercial ships worldwide. Although there is much discussion about the Convention, and the document itself runs to over 100 pages, the principal new obligations regarding minimum standards in respect of liability can be simply summarised as follows:

1. NOTICE PERIODS
- Minimum of 7 days.

2. SICK WAGES
- Minimum of 16 weeks (4 months).

3. REPATRIATION
- You must repatriate seafarers in the event of:
a) termination or expiry of their employment,
b) ship's loss or foundering,
c) illness or injury or otherwise being unable to continue in their role,
d) ship's entry to a war zone and seafarer exercises option to leave,
e) in the event of the shipowner being unable to fulfil their obligations as employer.

3. FINANCIAL SECURITY
- You must have financial security' in place, to meet your liability to repatriate crewmembers and pay them any compensation due in the event of your inability to do so (for instance, even payable when you are insolvent).
- This is not a 'compulsory insurance' like CLC or Bunker Convention, but if you cannot prove (by lodging a bond to cover these costs or by showing ringfenced funds in some other way) that these costs would be met, then you will need to buy insurance to respond in these situations. If you have an International Group Mutual P&I Certificate that will do, otherwise you may need to buy an 'MLC top-up' insurance to add onto your commercial P&I Certificate.

4. SEAFARER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS (SEAs)
- You must put certain basic things in the seafarer's employment contracts.
- You can use a pro-forma MLC-compliant contract called a Seafarer Employment Agreement or you can use your own contract so long as it contains all the minimum information required.

Tuesday, 21 January 2014

2014 EASING OF IRAN SANCTIONS

For years ship owners worldwide have had one principal country they are sure they need to avoid dealings with to remain on the right side of the law and their insurers, Iran. This country also happens to have a wealth of potential imports / exports and a huge oil industry, so there was always plenty of work available for ships in the region, had they only been able to take it up. The time has now come for the demand tap to be gradually turned back on.



The US,  five other major powers (UK, France, Germany, Russian and China) and the EU have now announced (20 January 2014) that they will begin easing sanctions against Iran and even providing relief to the country. This is in response to actions by Iran to wind down its ability to enrich uranium (and potentially develop nuclear weapons - the source of the sanctions to begin with).

Some sanctions are being suspended for 6 months, with the promise of them and others being lifted permanently if a final agreement can be reached between Iran and the countries on its cessation of uranium enrichment.

The sanctions which are now suspended are significant and include temporary lifting of financial sanctions, and restrictions on the buying and selling and associated services related to Iran's 'petrochemical products' (products derived from petroleum or oil, i.e. processed products). However, it must be noted that some of the highest-level sanctions remain in place in the meantime as normal, such as the block on buying Iranian crude oil and the freezing of the bank accounts of companies associated with the Iranian oil industry.

The full detail and guidance documents on the latest agreement is available here.

Monday, 20 January 2014

CONTRACT WORDING: 'including, without limitation...'

Ship owners benefit from a range of limitation conventions and contractual limitations and often their insurances (especially P&I Cover) will be prejudiced in the event that they optionally waive those rights to limitation, so careful attention to contract wording is essential.

A contract which seeks to have the ship owner waive his rights will normally include an express term to that effect, i.e. 'the owner hereby agrees to waive their right to limit under the LLMC Conventions, CLC Conventions or any other ...' or 'the Owner shall pay claims for damage to Charterers property arising under this contract in full and without limitation'.

This language is not to be confused with the phrase from american legalese which is now common in many commercial legal contracts worldwide - 'the Owner agrees to indemnify / settle ... including, without limitation, claims for x, y, z.'. Some have argued that this may be construed as an agreement to settle those specific listed claims without limitation, but this is not the case. This arrangement of words merely means 'included but not limited to'.

For example, if a ship owner agrees to pay the Charterers claims for losses resulting from the ship owner's crew's negligence including, without limitation, claims for pollution, property damage and third party injury, then those types of claims resulting from the ship owner's crew's negligence are definitely to be met by the shipowner, but this does not limit or prevent the Charterer from also claiming for other types of claims resulting from the ship owner's crew's negligence. Any application of limitation conventions is unaffected by the clause.

Another confusing phrase which is used in the same context is 'without limitation to the generality of the foregoing' or 'without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing', which merely means where you express a rule then give some examples, the examples cannot be said in any way to weaken or restrict the general rule which stands as if the examples had not been given.

How can I ensure that the Hague Visby Rules will apply to my Bills of Lading?

The Hague Visby Rules (HVR) provide a basic standard for carriage of cargo terms, and they are critical for shipowners in maintaining cover with their P&I Clubs as they must not contract on terms less favourable than the HVR. This is because the HVR contain exclusions, limitations and provisions which protect the shipowner. However, the Rules do not automatically apply so a shipowner must ensure they do apply to the cargo he is carrying by issuing Bills of Lading in the proper format. The following are the main points to remember in this respect.

1. CLAUSE PARAMOUNT
Article Ten (X) of the HVR states that the Rules apply to ' ... every bill of lading relating to the carriage of goods between ports in two different States if:(a) the bill of lading is issued in a contracting State, or(b) the carriage is from a port in a contracting state, or (c) the [bill of lading] provides that [they will govern the contract].

Therefore if neither (a) or (b) apply you need to ensure your Bill of Lading contains a 'Clause Paramount', i.e. a contractual term stating that the Bill is to be governed by the Hague Visby Rules.



2. DOCUMENT OF TITLE
The Rules only apply to Bills of Lading, not Sea Waybills, not Ships' Delivery Orders or other such documents, so you need to ensure you are issuing Bills of Lading. In general case law around the world has held that in order to be a Bill of Lading the Bill need not be negotiable (transferable / marked to order etc.); it can be a 'straight' Bill of Lading for instance to a fixed named consignee, but it must be a 'document of title', in other words possession of the original copy must evidence ownership of the goods and the Bill must be one which needs to be presented to obtain delivery of the goods. 


3. EXCLUDED CARGOES
If you are carrying live animals or deck cargo (which is stated as and in fact carried on deck) then the rules will not apply in any case as these are exclusions from the HVR application by virtue of Article I of the HVR.


4. ENGLAND & WALES
In the UK the Carriage of Goods by Sea Acts (1971 and 1992) alter some of the HVR application. They extend the remit of the act to carriage of goods from port to port within the UK (rather then between ports in two different states as per HVR) and they extend the rights of action against the carrier to the lawful holders of Bills of Lading, Sea Waybills and Ships' Delivery Orders. 

Sunday, 25 March 2012

The Risks of Shipping Cargo Overseas

A reader recently got in touch with a problem related to the above, looking for some help. They, as a manufacturer of goods had received an order from an overseas company and shipped a batch of their product to a foreign country, in a container, with a container line. However, the buyer never paid for the goods and didn't collect them either. The line was then claiming storage charges and they didn't know what to do as the buyer wasn't responding. 


Shipping lines will often charge this 'container demurrage' if goods are not collected and they must place them in storage. The cost can exceed the value of the goods in the container and you then risk the container being sold at a salvage auction to pay off the costs.


However, if your documents are all drawn up correctly you should not find yourself in the position where you have liability for these charges and no right to actually take possession of the goods. In giving some general advice on the matter to this reader I considered that a review of the processes at hand might be useful. The international transport of goods is risky, especially to new markets or customers, but often these new avenues of sales will open lucrative opportunities so it is all about minimising the risk. This can be done in four ways, as follows:

1. INCOTERMS
Ensure that your sales contract contains appropriate delivery terms. This can be easily achieved by selecting the correct INCOTERM (standard form international commercial terms drawn up by the International Chamber of Commerce) and using that in the Sales Contract. This determines who will do what and when the risk in the goods passes to the buyer.

You will probably want to just deliver the goods onto the ship in port (FOB) or may want to get them all the way to destination port in delivery country (CFR) or even direct to the buyer's door (DDP). This avoids arguments about whether you have done what you should have done in respect of the transport of the goods.

2. PAYMENT TERMS
You should arrange payment terms that match the risk of default and value of goods involved. Rather than sending goods to a customer in a foreign country on 30 days invoice terms and then chasing someone you barely know for payment in a foreign country, you should use a Letter of Credit or similar system, whereby you can use respective banks to essentially swap the cargo documents (which will allow collection of the goods) for payment or a guarantee of payment.

This avoids the problem, especially in new business relationships, that a seller doesn't want to release goods without payment and the buyer doesn't want to give over money without having the goods. A common process is that the manufacturer brings the goods to port and puts them on the ship, the ship checks them and signs off a Bill of Lading confirming x goods received onboard the ship. The shipper gives the Bill of Lading to the bank, who then releases the funds from the buyer's account and gives the buyer the Bill of Lading. They can then turn up at the discharge port and collect the goods.

3. CARGO CONTRACT
It is important to ship the goods on terms which allow the sales contract to be completed. For instance, if you send the goods off under a Sea Waybill (not negotiable) and the buyer doesn't pay then you will have a problem, as the ship will only deliver them onto the named received. These Bills cannot be endorsed. Similarly, if someone pays you in advance and you ship on a non-negotiable Bill of Lading to the named buyer, this might cause a problem if they were planning on selling on the cargo (trading it) during transit, and endorsing over the Bills to another party. Making sure this is agreed in Sales Contract should avoid problems.

4. INSURANCE
Finally, as with everything, the best way to alleviate risk is to insure against it. If trading in new markets take out a form of export credit or trade credit insurance (protecting you against the buyer defaulting and leaving you with unwanted costs and losses). If shipping on, say, CFR terms, the buyer will arrange his own cargo insurance but you will arrange the transport and shipping of the goods. What can happen here is that you ship the goods and the buyer contacts you to say they are damaged, so refuses to pay for them or pays less than the contract price. You can't claim the difference because the buyer has placed the cargo insurance and has the right to claim under that insurance. Of course they should then compensate you but this may not happen. There is a special type of cargo insurance - a Contingency (Seller's Interest) Policy - you can take out to cover this risk.

A marine insurance broker will be able to advise on which coverage is most appropriate for your needs and whether individual voyage or annual policies would be more cost effective in your circumstances.


Image Credit: Time Caynes

Sunday, 19 February 2012

Oil & Gas in the Falklands




Everyone will have noticed the increased tensions between the United Kingdom and Argentina recently in relation to the Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas). First Britain was sending Prince William on a tour of duty there, then they were sending the new Royal Navy ship HMS "Dauntless", and this week we heard that a whole Westminster committee is soon due to visit the Islands. Argentina has reported the UK to the United Nations for its 'militarisation' of the area and has, along with some of its neighbour states, blocked Falklands-flagged vessels from entering its ports.

Much has been made of the fact that this year signifies the 30th anniversary of the Falklands conflict and this has been cited as a possible cause of the ratcheting up of tensions in the region. However, it seems that the more likely cause is the dramatic change in the Islands' value as an economic asset, after recent discoveries of generous oil deposits in the Isalnd's waters.

In today's Sunday Times (19 February 2012, Business Supplement, Page 2) they report new research from a City investment firm which shows that the Islands could generate a huge fortune from new oil finds currently beginning to be exploited / prospected by a number of firms: 'THE Falkland Islands could eventually reap $ 177 billion (£ 122 billion) in tax and royalties from oil production ... ' they report.

This figure represents almost $ 58 million income per head of population (currently pop. 3,100), an enormous income for the Islands where at present each resident pays an average of around $ 5,000 a year in taxes to the revenue (which is far exceeded by the cost to the UK of servicing and defending the islands).

Sunday, 1 January 2012

Offshore Vessels



In the maritime industry today we often hear reference made to 'Offshore Vessels'. So let's look at  exactly what is meant by this, as vessels within this category are arguably more diverse in size, shape and operation than any other. 


     (Image Credit: Carl Tanzler)

Most people understand 'Offshore' in the maritime context to mean oil and gas rigs. However today it would be more accurate to describe it as the energy industries generally (encompassing both traditional oil and gas and new forms of energy generation at sea, like wave and windpower). Offshore vessels then include any vessels involved in these industries, as well as those involved in a few other very niche industries which occur entirely away from land (cable laying,  offshore dredging etc.).

Oil & Gas Vessels
Drillship
Semi-Sub
Rigs
Accommodation Vessels
Cargo Transporters
Platform Supply Vessels
AHTS
Guard Vessels / Patrol Boats
FPSO

Wind Farm Vessels
Construction
Engineer Supply

Other (Niche Offshore Industries)
Cable Layers
Pipe Layers
Offshore Dredging
Seismic Survey

  © Blogger template 'Isolation' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP